Saturday, January 30, 2010

Grand Orbital Party?

As the President gradually cranks up his rhetorical effort to recapture the "bipartisan" high ground, and Republicans obstruction is openly discussed, I'm hearing more and more of a particular counter-attack from Republicans, one that makes me wonder.

Was a large part of the Republican party somewhere off-planet during most of 2009?

This morning on NPR's Weekend Edition, Republican Senator Judd Gregg tried to convince us that, rather than the GOP being the partisan ones who were the problem, it was really the Democrats' fault:
This healthcare bill was not bipartisan. We weren't even allowed in the room while they were negotiating it! And then they brought it to the floor and forced a vote in 72 hours on Christmas Eve? To do it in that manner is totally irresponsible and was extraordinarily partisan.
Gregg was repeating a sort of claim that was also heard yesterday during Obama's appearance at the GOP policy retreat.

There are a number of Republicans who seem to believe that the health care bill happened very suddenly, without any opportunity for them to have input, and, despite their large number of really awesome ideas, they've been totally ignored by those power-mad Democrats.

How could they think that? Here on planet Earth, health care reform legislation has gone through many hearings of multiple Congressional committees on which sit many influential Republicans. In fact, one of those is the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) committee, on which someone claiming to be Judd Gregg himself sits. That committee passed a bill on July 15th, which seems quite a bit before Christmas Eve.

Gregg (or his simulacrum since he seems to have no memory of the event) voted against it, as did all the Republicans on the committee.

That may have something to do with why Gregg wasn't invited to the December negotiations, trying to combine bills passed by various committees. Typically, when legislators are negotiating final changes to bills, the discussions don't include those who voted against the entire idea in the first place. Historically, legislators have even voted for bills they didn't like, so that they could later have a place at the table to discuss changes.

That Gregg should expect to be invited to discuss something he'd already soundly rejected seems insane. As would complaining that he's had no chance to participate when he'd been in long hearing sessions and voted on a bill. Unless... perhaps it wasn't actually Judd Gregg who participated in the process back in July? What if, and I know this sounds crazy but..., what if Gregg and the other Republicans making this argument were actually abducted by space aliens early in 2009, and replaced by some kind of duplicate operating under alien control?

That might explain why Gregg and the others seem to have no memory of the interminable weeks during the summer when, despite an August deadline, there was no progress whatsoever as we all waited for Senator Max Baucus and his bipartisan 'Gang of Six' to deliver on their promise of a compromise bill.

How else is it possible that they don't recall week after week of Baucus' genuflections and contortions, desperately trying to woo his three Republican colleagues, dragging out into September, when finally realizing they would never say yes, he moved on without them? It's not like they could merely have been out of the country, because the US process, and the extremely moderate bill Baucus finally produced, got plenty of foreign coverage.

Here on planet Earth, the major subject of political debate in the United States during the entire length of 2009 was health care and what to do about it. (This, of course, in the context of decades of previous discussion about what to do about a system seen as increasingly troubled and expensive.) Months were spent as moderate Democrats engaged in a futile effort to get Republican votes, incorporating their ideas and preferences only to see them vote against it in the end. In fact, the entire effort started with conciliation to the Republicans: a single-payer plan was never on the table.

Yet to hear the Republicans tell it, none of that ever happened. As they remember it, all of their many wonderful ideas have been completely ignored, and, as Gregg so angrily contends, they weren't even allowed in the room and the Democrats forced the bill through all of a sudden on Christmas Eve.

Now, part of this might be do to a widespread confusion about the meaning of the word "ignored". There do seem to be people who think "ignore" means something like "to not accept", so that if an idea is listened to, evaluated, but rejected, they think it has been "ignored." In English we would say "considered" and "rejected", because otherwise it would imply that any idea, no matter how crazy, could only be either ignored or accepted. But not even this can completely explain the things these Republicans are saying, and the anger with which they are saying it.

So, as unlikely as it seems, I have to think the alien abduction hypothesis is the most plausible explanation. The people making such claims can't possibly have been here, participating in the process all year, and make such claims now. What other alternative is there, really?

That these Republicans are completely full of crap?

How likely is that?

Saturday, January 23, 2010

A Picture Worth A Thousand Words

From the talented Tom Toles.

(Go see it there, so he earns his pittance from syndication. We need editorial cartoonists.)

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Bush Wins!

I would be depressed about the radicals on the Supreme Court overturning a hundred years of precedent in order to fully convert our system to a corporatocracy, but I haven't finished being alternately depressed and incensed by the Democratic leadership rushing to shoot the Party dead in a ditch.

I mean, in the long run, how much will the overturning of campaign financing law matter, when the party is dominated by people who think that it's going to be OK with the American voter that, after all those promises, they spent an entire friggin' year on health care funding reform, and then just decided to drop it a foot from the goal line?

With the existing politicians so feckless already, who knows? It might just be refreshing to actually have them wearing corporate logos.

Today, Mr. Yes-We-Can is signaling that, what do you know, he's very busy right now and he can't be bothered pressuring anyone to get the damn thing finished. Fabulous. Way to lead, big guy.

I mean, I'm sure glad Barack spent some time today harshing on Wall Street, perhaps especially since it seems like he didn't get the Secretary of Goldman-Sachs on-board ahead of time. And to be fair, I'm all for limits on banks size and investments. We've got to reform the system. Absolutely.

But I'd feel WAY better about it if I knew that he'd already signed a law putting an end to the pre-existing conditions scandal, and that I had a hope of health care if I lost my job.

I kinda believed him when he told me last year that he'd get that done by August, so I'm not really in the mood to hear him say, "Well, you know what, Wall St. is really important, and herding Congressional kittens is hard work, so, well, I'm gonna go talk about banks now, n'K?" Mainly because the economy's so messed up that it'll be a while before the banksters can run it aground again, but people are sick and going untreated and I could easily be one of them, RIGHT NOW!

And once I get all cranked up about that, it's really hard to move on to deal with the way those Bush Supreme Court appointees (that I TOLD them not to confirm (especially Mr. Balls-and-Strikes Roberts - what a joke!)) are so thoroughly shameless about politicizing the Court and transforming America-as-we-know-it into a Second Gilded Age. It's just too much, you know?

Because a year ago I was full of hope and pride in my country and thinking that maybe, just maybe, we were gonna turn things around. And now what? The only "progress" is that instead of just calling Joe Lieberman the "Senator from Aetna" that he will actually just be the Senator from Aetna?

Swell. Just swell.

Priorities

Apparently, it is so important that we retain qualified Wall St. Banksters that almost nothing is being done to keep their firms from showering them with millions of dollars. And, when new White House rules would have kept one of those banksters out of a Cabinet post, and from bringing another along to work for him, something was done about it. It's very important to get and keep good banksters, both on Wall St. and in the administration.

On the other hand, it is so unimportant that we have qualified counter-terrorism people that almost nothing has been done to keep Jim DeMint from blocking them until they decide to give up trying.

It is, I guess, not so very important to have good counter-terrorism experts.

I'm not feeling very optimistic about the success of the Obama administration right now.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Another Take

All over the airwaves are people telling you what the "message" of the Scott Brown election is. Here's an opinion you probably won't hear. The "message" is that in the real world voters don't care about 'bipartisanship' or 'collegiality' or any other DC nicety. They care about results. If there has been a 'failure' in the Obama administration, it was spending far, far too much time courting Republicans who had planned a dead-ender obstructionist stand all along. If they'd hit the August deadline, they could have pivoted to jobs and the second stimulus in the fall, which was, I thought, the plan. Putting trust in Max Baucus was not change anyone could believe in.

The "message" is not that voters want Republicans, it's that they want the change they voted for in 2008, they aren't getting it, and they'll do just about anything because they are so desperate. Including electing a good looking, personable politician who, by the way, just happens to be a right-wing nut.

Now What?

What Jonathan Cohn says.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Saw This One Coming

Washington Post:
The FBI illegally collected more than 2,000 U.S. telephone call records between 2002 and 2006 by invoking terrorism emergencies that did not exist or simply persuading phone companies to provide records, according to internal bureau memos and interviews. FBI officials issued approvals after the fact to justify their actions.
Heckuva job, Bushie.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Um, ....?

Former White House spokeswoman Dana Perino was on Fox News' Hannity show, and said
"We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term"
No, really. She said that.

Neither of the two other people on the set, including Hannity, appeared to notice.

Ironically, the comment came in a discussion implying that the Obama administration was in denial about the terrorist nature of the Ft. Hood shootings.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

So Explain To Me Again

...why a single-payer national health care plan was never a part of this year's reform discussions?

I wonder what the Senate bill has to say about situations like this one.
SEATTLE (AP) — Seattle's Swedish Medical Center says it might stop accepting Regence BlueShield — the region's biggest health insurer — as a provider because its reimbursement rates are too low.

Regence said in a news release Thursday that Swedish wants a 32 percent rate increase over a three-year contract. Regence says its members can't afford the higher premiums that would result.

Swedish insists it has not yet made any decision to stop accepting Regence, but the insurer's reimbursement levels are well below industry standards, and it hopes the sides can agree on new rates.
My cardiologist is affiliated with Swedish. My pretty good employer-based insurance is through Regence.

I'm pretty sure this is just some negotiators playing hardball to the point where they are making threats in public, and that some accomodation will be reached. But the thought that a million people are being used as pawns in a contract negotiation really pisses me off. I can't imagine how I'd be feeling if I were going through cancer treatments, or some other long-term health crisis requiring continuity of care.

The largest hospital in Seattle is fighting with the largest insurer in the region, and the patients lose. And they are both nonprofits. Imagine what it would be like if there were also quarterly profit figures at stake.

The status quo in our health-care-financing system is, simply, insane.

I'd be happy to trade my health care plan for that on any of the Senators who is threatening to filibuster. I bet they don't have to worry about hospitals not taking their insurance anymore.

The Stupid, It Burns.

The girl is young enough to have an excuse (though someone as smart as she is should be able to see through that rhetoric), but the guy...ow. I can only hope he's too dumb to get himself legally registered to vote.